Could this movie be better without Jennifer?

Talk about Scream 3 here.

Moderator: Ghostface

User avatar
Devils_Reject
Mutiple Murders
Mutiple Murders
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:35 am
Location: Weymouth, Dorset, U.K
Status: Offline

Re: Could this movie be better without Jennifer?

Postby Devils_Reject » Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:00 pm

Agree with everything there, I think it was the script which was the main problem, if the writer followed Kevin's treatment more closely it could've been better, I remember reading somewhere that in Kevin's original treatment it was back in Woodsboro not Hollywood but Stab 3 was being shot down there. I saw some reviews on Wikipedia for this and they were saying that the horror cliches that the previous two Scream films commented on ended up falling into them in this one.
"Be careful, this is the moment where the supposedly dead killer comes back to life for one last scare"

User avatar
ScreamKing
Mutiple Murders
Mutiple Murders
Posts: 637
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:40 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Could this movie be better without Jennifer?

Postby ScreamKing » Fri Jul 17, 2009 5:11 pm

Ghostface wrote:agreed, the standards were lowered too much, in my honest opinion i think the second and third films themes of sequels and trilogies were wrong to do.
Completely disagree with you there. That's what the Scream movies are about and that's why we love them. I mean it's never the killers that bring up that it's a sequel, or any of the characters for that matter except for Randy. So it does work.
Gale: Jesus, the camera! Hurry!
Kenny: My name isn't Jesus.

User avatar
Ghostface
Admin
Admin
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 6:43 pm
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Could this movie be better without Jennifer?

Postby Ghostface » Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:12 pm

Thats true but when the killer strikes they all result to thinking of movie rules instead of what to really do in life..
Image

User avatar
ScreamKing
Mutiple Murders
Mutiple Murders
Posts: 637
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:40 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Could this movie be better without Jennifer?

Postby ScreamKing » Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:30 am

Cause that's what Billy and Stu started, so they have fun with it. I love these movies so much and I cannot wait for 4. Seriously this needs to come out next year.
Gale: Jesus, the camera! Hurry!
Kenny: My name isn't Jesus.

User avatar
Ghostface_Craven
Writer
Writer
Posts: 1258
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 6:18 pm
Location: Woodsboro, CA
Status: Offline

Re: Could this movie be better without Jennifer?

Postby Ghostface_Craven » Sat May 22, 2010 9:11 pm

With Jennifer it's a love/hate relationship. For Scream 3 it just worked.
Image

User avatar
Sidney Prescott
Scream Fan
Scream Fan
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:34 am
Status: Offline

Re: Could this movie be better without Jennifer?

Postby Sidney Prescott » Fri Aug 06, 2010 5:04 am

I really like Jennifer Jolie I adore her.why is it some of you do not like?

User avatar
Ghostface_Craven
Writer
Writer
Posts: 1258
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 6:18 pm
Location: Woodsboro, CA
Status: Offline

Re: Could this movie be better without Jennifer?

Postby Ghostface_Craven » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:04 pm

I liked Jennifer. I'll admit she had to grow on me. Her character just worked for this movie.
Image

User avatar
cj13
Serial Killer
Serial Killer
Posts: 942
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Victor Crowley's Swamp.
Status: Offline

Re: Could this movie be better without Jennifer?

Postby cj13 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:54 pm

I was so torn when she died :( imagine how great it would have been for her to be in 4.

User avatar
ScreamKing
Mutiple Murders
Mutiple Murders
Posts: 637
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:40 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Could this movie be better without Jennifer?

Postby ScreamKing » Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:07 am

As much as I love her (obviously), I don't think she would fit in Scream 4. She would probably be like Kincade if she did survive -- wouldn't be in it.
Gale: Jesus, the camera! Hurry!
Kenny: My name isn't Jesus.

User avatar
MichaelMyers81
GhostFace Collector
GhostFace Collector
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Haddonfield..
Status: Offline

Re: Could this movie be better without Jennifer?

Postby MichaelMyers81 » Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:54 pm

Considering Jennifer was the bestpart of part 3... No, this movie couldn't be better without her. RNDY2
Is that before or after you SLICED AND DICED...

User avatar
Ghostface
Admin
Admin
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 6:43 pm
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Could this movie be better without Jennifer?

Postby Ghostface » Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:33 pm

She wasnt the best part... i think Jennifer,Tyson, Angelina and Sarah were the better ones as a group.. Tom,Milton and even Roman were not the most liked characters for me.. not very in depth as we noramlly see.. Even in Scream 2 Sisters lois and Murphy had more character depth than the last 3..
Image

User avatar
ScreamKing
Mutiple Murders
Mutiple Murders
Posts: 637
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:40 pm
Status: Offline

Re: Could this movie be better without Jennifer?

Postby ScreamKing » Sat Mar 12, 2011 7:19 pm

I actually enjoyed Milton. He should have definitely gotten one more scene at least. Because remember when Jennifer and Gale find out that Maureen was in Milton's movies... and they go BACK IN WHAT!

John Milton... the horror producer. Those were his films.

NO ONE I WATCH IT WITH KNOWS WHO THE HELL HE IS AT THAT POINT. And they make it seem like we should know, like it's a big WHAT moment, when really its just a WHAT?????? moment. If you know what I mean, lol.

I do like his scene with Gale, Dewey, and Jennifer though... for some reason it's one of my favourite scenes in the movie. YOU'RE OBSESSED WITH HER! AND YOU'RE OBSESSED WITH HER DAUGHTER!

Alright, easy there Heraldo.
Gale: Jesus, the camera! Hurry!
Kenny: My name isn't Jesus.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest